Skip to main content

Investments & Losses

The reckless lending decisions that pushed Woking to the brink of financial ruin

Over more than two decades, the Conservative-controlled Woking Borough Council borrowed vast sums from the Public Works Loan Board and lent them on to a web of council-owned companies and commercial ventures. The council acted simultaneously as shareholder and lender to its own entities — a fundamental conflict of interest that the Grant Thornton Public Interest Report found was “inadequately governed.” Successive Conservative leaders John Kingsbury and David Bittleston were found to be “very closely aligned” with CEO Ray Morgan's approach. Woking is not alone: every West Surrey council that accumulated unsustainable debt was Conservative-controlled at the time.

Total council debt: approximately £2 billion

Making Woking — a borough of just 100,000 people — one of the most indebted local authorities in British history, relative to its size.

Where the Money Went

Victoria Square~£700m
~£700m
Thameswey Group£500m+
£500m+
GolDev Woking£250m
£250m
Others~£450m
~£450m

Approximate figures based on available data. Total council debt approached £2 billion.

Thameswey Corporate Structure

Thameswey Ltd

Est. 2003

Parent company of the Thameswey Group. Established in 2003 as the holding company for the council's commercial activities.

100% owned by Woking Borough Council

Thameswey Energy Ltd

Est. 2005

Energy generation and distribution company operating combined heat and power systems and district heating networks in Woking.

Thameswey Housing Ltd

Est. 2006

Housing company established to develop and manage affordable housing in the borough. Received significant PWLB-funded loans from the council.

Thameswey Developments Ltd

Est. 2009

Property development company handling development projects funded by council borrowing.

Thameswey Central Milton Keynes Ltd

Est. 2013

Subsidiary operating energy projects in Milton Keynes, extending Woking ratepayers' financial exposure beyond the borough's own boundaries.

Thameswey Solar Ltd

Est. 2017

Solar energy subsidiary established to develop and operate solar energy installations.

Thameswey Maintenance Services Ltd

Subsidiary providing maintenance services for properties and assets within the Thameswey Group.

Thameswey Sustainable Communities Ltd

Company focused on sustainable community development projects within the Thameswey Group.

Victoria Square Woking Ltd (VSWL)

Special purpose vehicle created to develop and manage the Victoria Square mixed-use development in Woking town centre. The single largest recipient of council lending.

Woking Necropolis & Mausoleum Ltd

Company managing the historic Brookwood Cemetery, the largest cemetery in the United Kingdom.

Planet Woking Ltd

Subsidiary involved in commercial activities in Woking town centre.

Rutland Woking (Residential) Ltd

Residential property company operating within the Thameswey Group structure.

Other council-funded companies (not part of Thameswey Group):

GolDev Woking Ltd

Property development company that received £250 million in council lending despite having virtually no independent assets. One of the most egregious examples of reckless lending.

The council acted as both sole shareholder and primary lender to all Thameswey companies — a conflict of interest identified by the Grant Thornton Public Interest Report.

Investment Details

Victoria Square (VSWL)

Amount Lent~£700m
Estimated Loss£350-490m

Flagship mixed-use development in Woking town centre that became the single largest drain on council finances. Includes a Hilton hotel, residential apartments, and retail space. Massively over-budget, the project exemplifies the council's reckless approach to commercial investment.

Thameswey Group

Amount Lent£500m+
Estimated LossSubstantial (exact figure under review)

Network of 13 council-owned companies encompassing energy, housing, property development, and other ventures. The Grant Thornton report found governance was 'inadequate' across the group. The council acted as both shareholder and lender to its own companies.

GolDev Woking Ltd

Amount Lent£250m
Estimated LossNear-total loss

One of the most egregious examples of reckless council lending. The council lent £250 million to a company that had virtually no assets of its own and was entirely dependent on council funding.

Greenfields School

Amount Lent£11m
Estimated LossUnder review

An £11 million loan from the council to a private school, raising questions about why a local authority was lending public money to a private educational institution at favourable rates.

Private School Loan

Amount Lent£6.4m
Estimated LossUnder review

A further £6.4 million loan to a private school, adding to the pattern of unconventional lending that characterised the council's commercial activities.

Pub Acquisitions

Amount Lent£2m+
Estimated LossUnder review

The council used borrowed money to purchase multiple public houses in the borough, adding to its increasingly diverse and unconventional portfolio of commercial assets.

Opportunities Fund

Amount Lent£3m
Estimated LossUnaccounted

A discretionary fund controlled by CEO Ray Morgan with minimal oversight. Allowed the chief executive to authorise spending without normal committee approval processes.